Our Non-Directed Support Organization
This essay, by Earl Gary Stevens, was originally published in the Talking About
Learning column in the May-June 1995 issue of Home Education Magazine.
Over the years I have spoken many times in these pages about our large, diverse
support organization, the Southern Maine Home Education Support Network. Individuals
and families within the network have worked and played together for a long
time, and this has led to the flowering of both friendships and community.
Almost 10
years have gone by since we began with only a handful of families, and we have
learned much along the way.
In recent months parents from many different places have told me stories
about disagreements and confusion and hurt feelings within their own
support organizations.
While groups begin with families joining together in a sincere desire to
cooperate in sharing support and resources, all too often they find
themselves sinking
into seemingly irresolvable differences of opinion over the details of group
activities and events.
Disagreements among members can begin with attempts to define what it is
that "the
group" should do. For example, what kind of support meetings should be
offered? Who will lead them? What philosophy of home-based education should
be emphasized?
Should kids be welcome at all support meetings, or should there be some gatherings
for parents only? Should discussions be moderated, or should they be entirely
informal? In addition to support meetings there are sports activities, social
events, field trips and a host of other possibilities to consider. All can
provide ground for conflicts.
We are often asked how we can manage to advertise a variety of support group
meetings and a long list of activities and events in this part of the state
with very little debate or disagreement over how they are conducted. The
answer is
that the sponsoring individuals make all the decisions, and the network itself
never offers anything. Every member is free to make his or her own decisions
about what to offer, either as an individual or in cooperation with others.
While some of our more active members may be perceived as leaders, especially
by newcomers,
the truth is that no leader or group of leaders decides what is to be on
the calendar.
This is not to say that everyone agrees about everything. No matter what
the activity or event, there will always be somebody who feels that it should
be
done differently. Sometimes even longtime members get confused about the
process and protest that some aspect of a given activity is not sensitive
to the needs
of this kind of family or that kind of philosophy; when this happens they
must remember that they are free to offer an alternative.
Seven years ago I decided to offer an activity which I called Family Baseball.
I wanted to create an environment where parents and boys and girls of all
ages and skill levels could have fun playing together with a non-lethal ball,
relaxed
rules, and a spirit of helping each other learn the game. I placed an ad
in our newsletter giving the time and place and a description of the game.
(See
HEM,
July/August 1989.)
At the beginning I was feeling my way along and having to make many decisions.
One parent thought that the game should be more challenging for bigger kids.
Another parent wanted it to be less challenging for little kids. Another
felt it was too disorganized, while still another believed that any adult
direction
at all was too coercive. Can you imagine trying to figure all this out at
a support group meeting? I listened to everybody and kept to my vision. Some
people drifted
away because it wasn't their cup of tea, while others became regulars in
our
weekly games, but these differences never became a source of group conflict
as they might have if the game were sponsored collectively.
For those who wish to try our approach the key is to create a point of
contact for families in which individuals and groups of individuals
are free to figure
out ways to meet their own needs. This may be a simple transition for some
organizations, but in other cases it might be easier to start a separate
mailing list with its
own calendar. Just focus on making it possible for families to explore
their own ways of working and playing together.
While it is true that a network is not a community, Eileen Yoder, who co-founded
SMHESN with me, points out that within our network we are a community of
people at various levels of commitment and caring and willingness to give.
Some people
give a great deal, and, as time passes, they tend to be seen as leaders.
But as long as we claim ownership and responsibility only for what we as
individuals
offer to others and not for any kind of group authority, then we avoid
misunderstandings and debilitating conflicts.
It is surprisingly easy to forget this principle. I've done that occasionally
when I have neglected to leave my name attached to an activity so that
in the newsletter it appears to be a group offering rather than an offering
by Earl
Gary Stevens. I realize this has happened when I find myself feeling responsible
for pleasing everybody instead of allowing myself to be guided by what
I
feel that I can give.
These are some of the practices and concepts that make SMHESN work for
us. This approach requires a lot of respect for the authority of individuals
to make their
own decisions. Most of us have been well-schooled to look for authority
from
above and it can be hard work to begin looking within. It is fun to see
the enthusiasm when newcomers first realize that they have the freedom
and the
means to create
opportunities for themselves and for others anytime they like. With each
passing month we learn more from each other.
Return to Main DragonTree HomeLearners Page
Earl Gary Stevens 1995. State and local nonprofit volunteer-based support
organizations may reprint this article for their members without asking
for permission. As
a favor, please send a copy to 25 Belmeade Road, Portland, Maine 04101.
All others please ask.